09. Milestone Project 2: SkimLit 📄🔥¶
In the previous notebook (NLP fundamentals in TensorFlow), we went through some fundamental natural lanuage processing concepts. The main ones being tokenzation (turning words into numbers) and creating embeddings (creating a numerical representation of words).
In this project, we're going to be putting what we've learned into practice.
More specificially, we're going to be replicating the deep learning model behind the 2017 paper PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequenctial Sentence Classification in Medical Abstracts.
When it was released, the paper presented a new dataset called PubMed 200k RCT which consists of ~200,000 labelled Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) abstracts.
The goal of the dataset was to explore the ability for NLP models to classify sentences which appear in sequential order.
In other words, given the abstract of a RCT, what role does each sentence serve in the abstract?
Example inputs (harder to read abstract from PubMed) and outputs (easier to read abstract) of the model we're going to build. The model will take an abstract wall of text and predict the section label each sentence should have.
Model Input¶
For example, can we train an NLP model which takes the following input (note: the following sample has had all numerical symbols replaced with "@"):
To investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( OA ). A total of @ patients with primary knee OA were randomized @:@ ; @ received @ mg/day of prednisolone and @ received placebo for @ weeks. Outcome measures included pain reduction and improvement in function scores and systemic inflammation markers. Pain was assessed using the visual analog pain scale ( @-@ mm ).
Secondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores , patient global assessment ( PGA ) of the severity of knee OA , and @-min walk distance ( @MWD )., Serum levels of interleukin @ ( IL-@ ) , IL-@ , tumor necrosis factor ( TNF ) - , and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hsCRP ) were measured. There was a clinically relevant reduction in the intervention group compared to the placebo group for knee pain , physical function , PGA , and @MWD at @ weeks. The mean difference between treatment arms ( @ % CI ) was @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; and @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ , respectively. Further , there was a clinically relevant reduction in the serum levels of IL-@ , IL-@ , TNF - , and hsCRP at @ weeks in the intervention group when compared to the placebo group. These differences remained significant at @ weeks. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder rate was @ % in the intervention group and @ % in the placebo group ( p < @ ). Low-dose oral prednisolone had both a short-term and a longer sustained effect resulting in less knee pain , better physical function , and attenuation of systemic inflammation in older patients with knee OA ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT@ ).
Model output¶
And returns the following output:
['###24293578\n',
'OBJECTIVE\tTo investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) .\n',
'METHODS\tA total of @ patients with primary knee OA were randomized @:@ ; @ received @ mg/day of prednisolone and @ received placebo for @ weeks .\n',
'METHODS\tOutcome measures included pain reduction and improvement in function scores and systemic inflammation markers .\n',
'METHODS\tPain was assessed using the visual analog pain scale ( @-@ mm ) .\n',
'METHODS\tSecondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores , patient global assessment ( PGA ) of the severity of knee OA , and @-min walk distance ( @MWD ) .\n',
'METHODS\tSerum levels of interleukin @ ( IL-@ ) , IL-@ , tumor necrosis factor ( TNF ) - , and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hsCRP ) were measured .\n',
'RESULTS\tThere was a clinically relevant reduction in the intervention group compared to the placebo group for knee pain , physical function , PGA , and @MWD at @ weeks .\n',
'RESULTS\tThe mean difference between treatment arms ( @ % CI ) was @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; and @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ , respectively .\n',
'RESULTS\tFurther , there was a clinically relevant reduction in the serum levels of IL-@ , IL-@ , TNF - , and hsCRP at @ weeks in the intervention group when compared to the placebo group .\n',
'RESULTS\tThese differences remained significant at @ weeks .\n',
'RESULTS\tThe Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder rate was @ % in the intervention group and @ % in the placebo group ( p < @ ) .\n',
'CONCLUSIONS\tLow-dose oral prednisolone had both a short-term and a longer sustained effect resulting in less knee pain , better physical function , and attenuation of systemic inflammation in older patients with knee OA ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT@ ) .\n',
'\n']
Problem in a sentence¶
The number of RCT papers released is continuing to increase, those without structured abstracts can be hard to read and in turn slow down researchers moving through the literature.
Solution in a sentence¶
Create an NLP model to classify abstract sentences into the role they play (e.g. objective, methods, results, etc) to enable researchers to skim through the literature (hence SkimLit 🤓🔥) and dive deeper when necessary.
📖 Resources: Before going through the code in this notebook, you might want to get a background of what we're going to be doing. To do so, spend an hour (or two) going through the following papers and then return to this notebook:
- Where our data is coming from: PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstracts
- Where our model is coming from: [*Neural networks for joint sentence
classification in medical paper abstracts*](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05251.pdf).
What we're going to cover¶
Time to take what we've learned in the NLP fundmentals notebook and build our biggest NLP model yet:
- Downloading a text dataset (PubMed RCT200k from GitHub)
- Writing a preprocessing function to prepare our data for modelling
- Setting up a series of modelling experiments
- Making a baseline (TF-IDF classifier)
- Deep models with different combinations of: token embeddings, character embeddings, pretrained embeddings, positional embeddings
- Building our first multimodal model (taking multiple types of data inputs)
- Replicating the model architecture from https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05251
- Find the most wrong predictions
- Making predictions on PubMed abstracts from the wild
How you should approach this notebook¶
You can read through the descriptions and the code (it should all run, except for the cells which error on purpose), but there's a better option.
Write all of the code yourself.
Yes. I'm serious. Create a new notebook, and rewrite each line by yourself. Investigate it, see if you can break it, why does it break?
You don't have to write the text descriptions but writing the code yourself is a great way to get hands-on experience.
Don't worry if you make mistakes, we all do. The way to get better and make less mistakes is to write more code.
📖 Resources:
- See the full set of course materials on GitHub: https://github.com/mrdbourke/tensorflow-deep-learning
- See code updates to this notebook on GitHub discussions: https://github.com/mrdbourke/tensorflow-deep-learning/discussions/557
import datetime
print(f"Notebook last run (end-to-end): {datetime.datetime.now()}")
Notebook last run (end-to-end): 2023-05-26 03:47:27.469424
Confirm access to a GPU¶
Since we're going to be building deep learning models, let's make sure we have a GPU.
In Google Colab, you can set this up by going to Runtime -> Change runtime type -> Hardware accelerator -> GPU.
If you don't have access to a GPU, the models we're building here will likely take up to 10x longer to run.
# Check for GPU
!nvidia-smi -L
GPU 0: NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB (UUID: GPU-061bcc09-64a4-755a-357c-181dfae1f4a9)
Get data¶
Before we can start building a model, we've got to download the PubMed 200k RCT dataset.
In a phenomenal act of kindness, the authors of the paper have made the data they used for their research availably publically and for free in the form of .txt files on GitHub.
We can copy them to our local directory using git clone https://github.com/Franck-Dernoncourt/pubmed-rct.
!git clone https://github.com/Franck-Dernoncourt/pubmed-rct.git
!ls pubmed-rct
Cloning into 'pubmed-rct'... remote: Enumerating objects: 33, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (8/8), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. remote: Total 33 (delta 5), reused 5 (delta 5), pack-reused 25 Unpacking objects: 100% (33/33), 177.08 MiB | 9.05 MiB/s, done. PubMed_200k_RCT PubMed_200k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign PubMed_20k_RCT PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign README.md
Checking the contents of the downloaded repository, you can see there are four folders.
Each contains a different version of the PubMed 200k RCT dataset.
Looking at the README file from the GitHub page, we get the following information:
- PubMed 20k is a subset of PubMed 200k. I.e., any abstract present in PubMed 20k is also present in PubMed 200k.
PubMed_200k_RCTis the same asPubMed_200k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign, except that in the latter all numbers had been replaced by@. (same forPubMed_20k_RCTvs.PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign).- Since Github file size limit is 100 MiB, we had to compress
PubMed_200k_RCT\train.7zandPubMed_200k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign\train.zip. To uncompresstrain.7z, you may use 7-Zip on Windows, Keka on Mac OS X, or p7zip on Linux.
To begin with, the dataset we're going to be focused on is PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign.
Why this one?
Rather than working with the whole 200k dataset, we'll keep our experiments quick by starting with a smaller subset. We could've chosen the dataset with numbers instead of having them replaced with @ but we didn't.
Let's check the file contents.
# Check what files are in the PubMed_20K dataset
!ls pubmed-rct/PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign
dev.txt test.txt train.txt
Beautiful, looks like we've got three separate text files:
train.txt- training samples.dev.txt- dev is short for development set, which is another name for validation set (in our case, we'll be using and referring to this file as our validation set).test.txt- test samples.
To save ourselves typing out the filepath to our target directory each time, let's turn it into a variable.
# Start by using the 20k dataset
data_dir = "pubmed-rct/PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign/"
# Check all of the filenames in the target directory
import os
filenames = [data_dir + filename for filename in os.listdir(data_dir)]
filenames
['pubmed-rct/PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign/test.txt', 'pubmed-rct/PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign/train.txt', 'pubmed-rct/PubMed_20k_RCT_numbers_replaced_with_at_sign/dev.txt']
Preprocess data¶
Okay, now we've downloaded some text data, do you think we're ready to model it?
Wait...
We've downloaded the data but we haven't even looked at it yet.
What's the motto for getting familiar with any new dataset?
I'll give you a clue, the word begins with "v" and we say it three times.
Vibe, vibe, vibe?
Sort of... we've definitely got to the feel the vibe of our data.
Values, values, values?
Right again, we want to see lots of values but not quite what we're looking for.
Visualize, visualize, visualize?
Boom! That's it. To get familiar and understand how we have to prepare our data for our deep learning models, we've got to visualize it.
Because our data is in the form of text files, let's write some code to read each of the lines in a target file.
# Create function to read the lines of a document
def get_lines(filename):
"""
Reads filename (a text file) and returns the lines of text as a list.
Args:
filename: a string containing the target filepath to read.
Returns:
A list of strings with one string per line from the target filename.
For example:
["this is the first line of filename",
"this is the second line of filename",
"..."]
"""
with open(filename, "r") as f:
return f.readlines()
Alright, we've got a little function, get_lines() which takes the filepath of a text file, opens it, reads each of the lines and returns them.
Let's try it out on the training data (train.txt).
train_lines = get_lines(data_dir+"train.txt")
train_lines[:20] # the whole first example of an abstract + a little more of the next one
['###24293578\n', 'OBJECTIVE\tTo investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) .\n', 'METHODS\tA total of @ patients with primary knee OA were randomized @:@ ; @ received @ mg/day of prednisolone and @ received placebo for @ weeks .\n', 'METHODS\tOutcome measures included pain reduction and improvement in function scores and systemic inflammation markers .\n', 'METHODS\tPain was assessed using the visual analog pain scale ( @-@ mm ) .\n', 'METHODS\tSecondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores , patient global assessment ( PGA ) of the severity of knee OA , and @-min walk distance ( @MWD ) .\n', 'METHODS\tSerum levels of interleukin @ ( IL-@ ) , IL-@ , tumor necrosis factor ( TNF ) - , and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hsCRP ) were measured .\n', 'RESULTS\tThere was a clinically relevant reduction in the intervention group compared to the placebo group for knee pain , physical function , PGA , and @MWD at @ weeks .\n', 'RESULTS\tThe mean difference between treatment arms ( @ % CI ) was @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; and @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ , respectively .\n', 'RESULTS\tFurther , there was a clinically relevant reduction in the serum levels of IL-@ , IL-@ , TNF - , and hsCRP at @ weeks in the intervention group when compared to the placebo group .\n', 'RESULTS\tThese differences remained significant at @ weeks .\n', 'RESULTS\tThe Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder rate was @ % in the intervention group and @ % in the placebo group ( p < @ ) .\n', 'CONCLUSIONS\tLow-dose oral prednisolone had both a short-term and a longer sustained effect resulting in less knee pain , better physical function , and attenuation of systemic inflammation in older patients with knee OA ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT@ ) .\n', '\n', '###24854809\n', 'BACKGROUND\tEmotional eating is associated with overeating and the development of obesity .\n', 'BACKGROUND\tYet , empirical evidence for individual ( trait ) differences in emotional eating and cognitive mechanisms that contribute to eating during sad mood remain equivocal .\n', 'OBJECTIVE\tThe aim of this study was to test if attention bias for food moderates the effect of self-reported emotional eating during sad mood ( vs neutral mood ) on actual food intake .\n', 'OBJECTIVE\tIt was expected that emotional eating is predictive of elevated attention for food and higher food intake after an experimentally induced sad mood and that attentional maintenance on food predicts food intake during a sad versus a neutral mood .\n', 'METHODS\tParticipants ( N = @ ) were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental mood induction conditions ( sad/neutral ) .\n']
Reading the lines from the training text file results in a list of strings containing different abstract samples, the sentences in a sample along with the role the sentence plays in the abstract.
The role of each sentence is prefixed at the start of each line separated by a tab (\t) and each sentence finishes with a new line (\n).
Different abstracts are separated by abstract ID's (lines beginning with ###) and newlines (\n).
Knowing this, it looks like we've got a couple of steps to do to get our samples ready to pass as training data to our future machine learning model.
Let's write a function to perform the following steps:
- Take a target file of abstract samples.
- Read the lines in the target file.
- For each line in the target file:
- If the line begins with
###mark it as an abstract ID and the beginning of a new abstract.- Keep count of the number of lines in a sample.
- If the line begins with
\nmark it as the end of an abstract sample.- Keep count of the total lines in a sample.
- Record the text before the
\tas the label of the line. - Record the text after the
\tas the text of the line.
- If the line begins with
- Return all of the lines in the target text file as a list of dictionaries containing the key/value pairs:
"line_number"- the position of the line in the abstract (e.g.3)."target"- the role of the line in the abstract (e.g.OBJECTIVE)."text"- the text of the line in the abstract."total_lines"- the total lines in an abstract sample (e.g.14).
- Abstract ID's and newlines should be omitted from the returned preprocessed data.
Example returned preprocessed sample (a single line from an abstract):
[{'line_number': 0,
'target': 'OBJECTIVE',
'text': 'to investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( oa ) .',
'total_lines': 11},
...]
def preprocess_text_with_line_numbers(filename):
"""Returns a list of dictionaries of abstract line data.
Takes in filename, reads its contents and sorts through each line,
extracting things like the target label, the text of the sentence,
how many sentences are in the current abstract and what sentence number
the target line is.
Args:
filename: a string of the target text file to read and extract line data
from.
Returns:
A list of dictionaries each containing a line from an abstract,
the lines label, the lines position in the abstract and the total number
of lines in the abstract where the line is from. For example:
[{"target": 'CONCLUSION',
"text": The study couldn't have gone better, turns out people are kinder than you think",
"line_number": 8,
"total_lines": 8}]
"""
input_lines = get_lines(filename) # get all lines from filename
abstract_lines = "" # create an empty abstract
abstract_samples = [] # create an empty list of abstracts
# Loop through each line in target file
for line in input_lines:
if line.startswith("###"): # check to see if line is an ID line
abstract_id = line
abstract_lines = "" # reset abstract string
elif line.isspace(): # check to see if line is a new line
abstract_line_split = abstract_lines.splitlines() # split abstract into separate lines
# Iterate through each line in abstract and count them at the same time
for abstract_line_number, abstract_line in enumerate(abstract_line_split):
line_data = {} # create empty dict to store data from line
target_text_split = abstract_line.split("\t") # split target label from text
line_data["target"] = target_text_split[0] # get target label
line_data["text"] = target_text_split[1].lower() # get target text and lower it
line_data["line_number"] = abstract_line_number # what number line does the line appear in the abstract?
line_data["total_lines"] = len(abstract_line_split) - 1 # how many total lines are in the abstract? (start from 0)
abstract_samples.append(line_data) # add line data to abstract samples list
else: # if the above conditions aren't fulfilled, the line contains a labelled sentence
abstract_lines += line
return abstract_samples
Beautiful! That's one good looking function. Let's use it to preprocess each of our RCT 20k datasets.
# Get data from file and preprocess it
%%time
train_samples = preprocess_text_with_line_numbers(data_dir + "train.txt")
val_samples = preprocess_text_with_line_numbers(data_dir + "dev.txt") # dev is another name for validation set
test_samples = preprocess_text_with_line_numbers(data_dir + "test.txt")
len(train_samples), len(val_samples), len(test_samples)
CPU times: user 344 ms, sys: 77.2 ms, total: 421 ms Wall time: 420 ms
(180040, 30212, 30135)
How do our training samples look?
# Check the first abstract of our training data
train_samples[:14]
[{'target': 'OBJECTIVE',
'text': 'to investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( oa ) .',
'line_number': 0,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'METHODS',
'text': 'a total of @ patients with primary knee oa were randomized @:@ ; @ received @ mg/day of prednisolone and @ received placebo for @ weeks .',
'line_number': 1,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'METHODS',
'text': 'outcome measures included pain reduction and improvement in function scores and systemic inflammation markers .',
'line_number': 2,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'METHODS',
'text': 'pain was assessed using the visual analog pain scale ( @-@ mm ) .',
'line_number': 3,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'METHODS',
'text': 'secondary outcome measures included the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index scores , patient global assessment ( pga ) of the severity of knee oa , and @-min walk distance ( @mwd ) .',
'line_number': 4,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'METHODS',
'text': 'serum levels of interleukin @ ( il-@ ) , il-@ , tumor necrosis factor ( tnf ) - , and high-sensitivity c-reactive protein ( hscrp ) were measured .',
'line_number': 5,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'RESULTS',
'text': 'there was a clinically relevant reduction in the intervention group compared to the placebo group for knee pain , physical function , pga , and @mwd at @ weeks .',
'line_number': 6,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'RESULTS',
'text': 'the mean difference between treatment arms ( @ % ci ) was @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; and @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ , respectively .',
'line_number': 7,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'RESULTS',
'text': 'further , there was a clinically relevant reduction in the serum levels of il-@ , il-@ , tnf - , and hscrp at @ weeks in the intervention group when compared to the placebo group .',
'line_number': 8,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'RESULTS',
'text': 'these differences remained significant at @ weeks .',
'line_number': 9,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'RESULTS',
'text': 'the outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials-osteoarthritis research society international responder rate was @ % in the intervention group and @ % in the placebo group ( p < @ ) .',
'line_number': 10,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'CONCLUSIONS',
'text': 'low-dose oral prednisolone had both a short-term and a longer sustained effect resulting in less knee pain , better physical function , and attenuation of systemic inflammation in older patients with knee oa ( clinicaltrials.gov identifier nct@ ) .',
'line_number': 11,
'total_lines': 11},
{'target': 'BACKGROUND',
'text': 'emotional eating is associated with overeating and the development of obesity .',
'line_number': 0,
'total_lines': 10},
{'target': 'BACKGROUND',
'text': 'yet , empirical evidence for individual ( trait ) differences in emotional eating and cognitive mechanisms that contribute to eating during sad mood remain equivocal .',
'line_number': 1,
'total_lines': 10}]
Fantastic! Looks like our preprocess_text_with_line_numbers() function worked great.
How about we turn our list of dictionaries into pandas DataFrame's so we visualize them better?
import pandas as pd
train_df = pd.DataFrame(train_samples)
val_df = pd.DataFrame(val_samples)
test_df = pd.DataFrame(test_samples)
train_df.head(14)
| target | text | line_number | total_lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | OBJECTIVE | to investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of dail... | 0 | 11 |
| 1 | METHODS | a total of @ patients with primary knee oa wer... | 1 | 11 |
| 2 | METHODS | outcome measures included pain reduction and i... | 2 | 11 |
| 3 | METHODS | pain was assessed using the visual analog pain... | 3 | 11 |
| 4 | METHODS | secondary outcome measures included the wester... | 4 | 11 |
| 5 | METHODS | serum levels of interleukin @ ( il-@ ) , il-@ ... | 5 | 11 |
| 6 | RESULTS | there was a clinically relevant reduction in t... | 6 | 11 |
| 7 | RESULTS | the mean difference between treatment arms ( @... | 7 | 11 |
| 8 | RESULTS | further , there was a clinically relevant redu... | 8 | 11 |
| 9 | RESULTS | these differences remained significant at @ we... | 9 | 11 |
| 10 | RESULTS | the outcome measures in rheumatology clinical ... | 10 | 11 |
| 11 | CONCLUSIONS | low-dose oral prednisolone had both a short-te... | 11 | 11 |
| 12 | BACKGROUND | emotional eating is associated with overeating... | 0 | 10 |
| 13 | BACKGROUND | yet , empirical evidence for individual ( trai... | 1 | 10 |
Now our data is in DataFrame form, we can perform some data analysis on it.
# Distribution of labels in training data
train_df.target.value_counts()
METHODS 59353 RESULTS 57953 CONCLUSIONS 27168 BACKGROUND 21727 OBJECTIVE 13839 Name: target, dtype: int64
Looks like sentences with the OBJECTIVE label are the least common.
How about we check the distribution of our abstract lengths?
train_df.total_lines.plot.hist();
Okay, looks like most of the abstracts are around 7 to 15 sentences in length.
It's good to check these things out to make sure when we do train a model or test it on unseen samples, our results aren't outlandish.
Get lists of sentences¶
When we build our deep learning model, one of its main inputs will be a list of strings (the lines of an abstract).
We can get these easily from our DataFrames by calling the tolist() method on our "text" columns.
# Convert abstract text lines into lists
train_sentences = train_df["text"].tolist()
val_sentences = val_df["text"].tolist()
test_sentences = test_df["text"].tolist()
len(train_sentences), len(val_sentences), len(test_sentences)
(180040, 30212, 30135)
# View first 10 lines of training sentences
train_sentences[:10]
['to investigate the efficacy of @ weeks of daily low-dose oral prednisolone in improving pain , mobility , and systemic low-grade inflammation in the short term and whether the effect would be sustained at @ weeks in older adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis ( oa ) .', 'a total of @ patients with primary knee oa were randomized @:@ ; @ received @ mg/day of prednisolone and @ received placebo for @ weeks .', 'outcome measures included pain reduction and improvement in function scores and systemic inflammation markers .', 'pain was assessed using the visual analog pain scale ( @-@ mm ) .', 'secondary outcome measures included the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index scores , patient global assessment ( pga ) of the severity of knee oa , and @-min walk distance ( @mwd ) .', 'serum levels of interleukin @ ( il-@ ) , il-@ , tumor necrosis factor ( tnf ) - , and high-sensitivity c-reactive protein ( hscrp ) were measured .', 'there was a clinically relevant reduction in the intervention group compared to the placebo group for knee pain , physical function , pga , and @mwd at @ weeks .', 'the mean difference between treatment arms ( @ % ci ) was @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ ; and @ ( @-@ @ ) , p < @ , respectively .', 'further , there was a clinically relevant reduction in the serum levels of il-@ , il-@ , tnf - , and hscrp at @ weeks in the intervention group when compared to the placebo group .', 'these differences remained significant at @ weeks .']
Alright, we've separated our text samples. As you might've guessed, we'll have to write code to convert the text to numbers before we can use it with our machine learning models, we'll get to this soon.
Make numeric labels (ML models require numeric labels)¶
We're going to create one hot and label encoded labels.
We could get away with just making label encoded labels, however, TensorFlow's CategoricalCrossentropy loss function likes to have one hot encoded labels (this will enable us to use label smoothing later on).
To numerically encode labels we'll use Scikit-Learn's OneHotEncoder and LabelEncoder classes.
# One hot encode labels
from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder
one_hot_encoder = OneHotEncoder(sparse=False)
train_labels_one_hot = one_hot_encoder.fit_transform(train_df["target"].to_numpy().reshape(-1, 1))
val_labels_one_hot = one_hot_encoder.transform(val_df["target"].to_numpy().reshape(-1, 1))
test_labels_one_hot = one_hot_encoder.transform(test_df["target"].to_numpy().reshape(-1, 1))
# Check what training labels look like
train_labels_one_hot
/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/sklearn/preprocessing/_encoders.py:868: FutureWarning: `sparse` was renamed to `sparse_output` in version 1.2 and will be removed in 1.4. `sparse_output` is ignored unless you leave `sparse` to its default value. warnings.warn(
array([[0., 0., 0., 1., 0.],
[0., 0., 1., 0., 0.],
[0., 0., 1., 0., 0.],
...,
[0., 0., 0., 0., 1.],
[0., 1., 0., 0., 0.],
[0., 1., 0., 0., 0.]])
Label encode labels¶
# Extract labels ("target" columns) and encode them into integers
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
label_encoder = LabelEncoder()
train_labels_encoded = label_encoder.fit_transform(train_df["target"].to_numpy())
val_labels_encoded = label_encoder.transform(val_df["target"].to_numpy())
test_labels_encoded = label_encoder.transform(test_df["target"].to_numpy())
# Check what training labels look like
train_labels_encoded
array([3, 2, 2, ..., 4, 1, 1])
Now we've trained an instance of LabelEncoder, we can get the class names and number of classes using the classes_ attribute.
# Get class names and number of classes from LabelEncoder instance
num_classes = len(label_encoder.classes_)
class_names = label_encoder.classes_
num_classes, class_names
(5,
array(['BACKGROUND', 'CONCLUSIONS', 'METHODS', 'OBJECTIVE', 'RESULTS'],
dtype=object))
Creating a series of model experiments¶
We've proprocessed our data so now, in true machine learning fashion, it's time to setup a series of modelling experiments.
We'll start by creating a simple baseline model to obtain a score we'll try to beat by building more and more complex models as we move towards replicating the sequence model outlined in Neural networks for joint sentence classification in medical paper abstracts.
For each model, we'll train it on the training data and evaluate it on the validation data.
Model 0: Getting a baseline¶
Our first model we'll be a TF-IDF Multinomial Naive Bayes as recommended by Scikit-Learn's machine learning map.
To build it, we'll create a Scikit-Learn Pipeline which uses the TfidfVectorizer class to convert our abstract sentences to numbers using the TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequecy) algorithm and then learns to classify our sentences using the MultinomialNB aglorithm.
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.naive_bayes import MultinomialNB
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
# Create a pipeline
model_0 = Pipeline([
("tf-idf", TfidfVectorizer()),
("clf", MultinomialNB())
])
# Fit the pipeline to the training data
model_0.fit(X=train_sentences,
y=train_labels_encoded);
Due to the speed of the Multinomial Naive Bayes algorithm, it trains very quickly.
We can evaluate our model's accuracy on the validation dataset using the score() method.
# Evaluate baseline on validation dataset
model_0.score(X=val_sentences,
y=val_labels_encoded)
0.7218323844829869
Nice! Looks like 72.1% accuracy will be the number to beat with our deeper models.
Now let's make some predictions with our baseline model to further evaluate it.
# Make predictions
baseline_preds = model_0.predict(val_sentences)
baseline_preds
array([4, 1, 3, ..., 4, 4, 1])
To evaluate our baseline's predictions, we'll import the calculate_results() function we created in the previous notebook and added it to our helper_functions.py script to compare them to the ground truth labels.
More specificially the calculate_results() function will help us obtain the following:
- Accuracy
- Precision
- Recall
- F1-score
Download helper functions script¶
Let's get our helper_functions.py script we've been using to store helper functions we've created in previous notebooks.
# Download helper functions script
!wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mrdbourke/tensorflow-deep-learning/main/extras/helper_functions.py
--2023-05-26 03:47:55-- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mrdbourke/tensorflow-deep-learning/main/extras/helper_functions.py Resolving raw.githubusercontent.com (raw.githubusercontent.com)... 185.199.108.133, 185.199.109.133, 185.199.110.133, ... Connecting to raw.githubusercontent.com (raw.githubusercontent.com)|185.199.108.133|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 10246 (10K) [text/plain] Saving to: ‘helper_functions.py’ helper_functions.py 100%[===================>] 10.01K --.-KB/s in 0s 2023-05-26 03:47:55 (118 MB/s) - ‘helper_functions.py’ saved [10246/10246]
Now we've got the helper functions script we can import the caculate_results() function and see how our baseline model went.
# Import calculate_results helper function
from helper_functions import calculate_results
# Calculate baseline results
baseline_results = calculate_results(y_true=val_labels_encoded,
y_pred=baseline_preds)
baseline_results
{'accuracy': 72.1832384482987,
'precision': 0.7186466952323352,
'recall': 0.7218323844829869,
'f1': 0.6989250353450294}
Preparing our data for deep sequence models¶
Excellent! We've got a working baseline to try and improve upon.
But before we start building deeper models, we've got to create vectorization and embedding layers.
The vectorization layer will convert our text to numbers and the embedding layer will capture the relationships between those numbers.
To start creating our vectorization and embedding layers, we'll need to import the appropriate libraries (namely TensorFlow and NumPy).
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.keras import layers
Since we'll be turning our sentences into numbers, it's a good idea to figure out how many words are in each sentence.
When our model goes through our sentences, it works best when they're all the same length (this is important for creating batches of the same size tensors).
For example, if one sentence is eight words long and another is 29 words long, we want to pad the eight word sentence with zeros so it ends up being the same length as the 29 word sentence.
Let's write some code to find the average length of sentences in the training set.
# How long is each sentence on average?
sent_lens = [len(sentence.split()) for sentence in train_sentences]
avg_sent_len = np.mean(sent_lens)
avg_sent_len # return average sentence length (in tokens)
26.338269273494777
How about the distribution of sentence lengths?
# What's the distribution look like?
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.hist(sent_lens, bins=7);
Looks like the vast majority of sentences are between 0 and 50 tokens in length.
We can use NumPy's percentile to find the value which covers 95% of the sentence lengths.
# How long of a sentence covers 95% of the lengths?
output_seq_len = int(np.percentile(sent_lens, 95))
output_seq_len
55
Wonderful! It looks like 95% of the sentences in our training set have a length of 55 tokens or less.
When we create our tokenization layer, we'll use this value to turn all of our sentences into the same length. Meaning sentences with a length below 55 get padded with zeros and sentences with a length above 55 get truncated (words after 55 get cut off).
🤔 Question: Why 95%?
We could use the max sentence length of the sentences in the training set.
# Maximum sentence length in the training set
max(sent_lens)
296
However, since hardly any sentences even come close to the max length, it would mean the majority of the data we pass to our model would be zeros (sinces all sentences below the max length would get padded with zeros).
🔑 Note: The steps we've gone through are good practice when working with a text corpus for a NLP problem. You want to know how long your samples are and what the distribution of them is. See section 4 Data Analysis of the PubMed 200k RCT paper for further examples.
Create text vectorizer¶
Now we've got a little more information about our texts, let's create a way to turn it into numbers.
To do so, we'll use the TextVectorization layer from TensorFlow.
We'll keep all the parameters default except for max_tokens (the number of unique words in our dataset) and output_sequence_length (our desired output length for each vectorized sentence).
Section 3.2 of the PubMed 200k RCT paper states the vocabulary size of the PubMed 20k dataset as 68,000. So we'll use that as our max_tokens parameter.
# How many words are in our vocabulary? (taken from 3.2 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06071.pdf)
max_tokens = 68000
And since discovered a sentence length of 55 covers 95% of the training sentences, we'll use that as our output_sequence_length parameter.
# Create text vectorizer
# After TensorFlow 2.6
from tensorflow.keras.layers import TextVectorization
# Before TensorFlow 2.6
# from tensorflow.keras.layers.experimental.preprocessing import TextVectorization
text_vectorizer = TextVectorization(max_tokens=max_tokens, # number of words in vocabulary
output_sequence_length=55) # desired output length of vectorized sequences
Great! Looks like our text_vectorizer is ready, let's adapt it to the training data (let it read the training data and figure out what number should represent what word) and then test it out.
# Adapt text vectorizer to training sentences
text_vectorizer.adapt(train_sentences)
# Test out text vectorizer
import random
target_sentence = random.choice(train_sentences)
print(f"Text:\n{target_sentence}")
print(f"\nLength of text: {len(target_sentence.split())}")
print(f"\nVectorized text:\n{text_vectorizer([target_sentence])}")
Text:
patients later completed a ten-question true-or-false knowledge questionnaire and a six-item satisfaction survey .
Length of text: 14
Vectorized text:
[[ 12 869 253 8 44042 43177 494 325 3 8 34340 428
885 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0]]
Cool, we've now got a way to turn our sequences into numbers.
🛠 Exercise: Try running the cell above a dozen or so times. What do you notice about sequences with a length less than 55?
Using the get_vocabulary() method of our text_vectorizer we can find out a few different tidbits about our text.
# How many words in our training vocabulary?
rct_20k_text_vocab = text_vectorizer.get_vocabulary()
print(f"Number of words in vocabulary: {len(rct_20k_text_vocab)}"),
print(f"Most common words in the vocabulary: {rct_20k_text_vocab[:5]}")
print(f"Least common words in the vocabulary: {rct_20k_text_vocab[-5:]}")
Number of words in vocabulary: 64841 Most common words in the vocabulary: ['', '[UNK]', 'the', 'and', 'of'] Least common words in the vocabulary: ['aainduced', 'aaigroup', 'aachener', 'aachen', 'aaacp']
And if we wanted to figure out the configuration of our text_vectorizer we can use the get_config() method.
# Get the config of our text vectorizer
text_vectorizer.get_config()
{'name': 'text_vectorization',
'trainable': True,
'dtype': 'string',
'batch_input_shape': (None,),
'max_tokens': 68000,
'standardize': 'lower_and_strip_punctuation',
'split': 'whitespace',
'ngrams': None,
'output_mode': 'int',
'output_sequence_length': 55,
'pad_to_max_tokens': False,
'sparse': False,
'ragged': False,
'vocabulary': None,
'idf_weights': None,
'encoding': 'utf-8',
'vocabulary_size': 64841}
Create custom text embedding¶
Our token_vectorization layer maps the words in our text directly to numbers. However, this doesn't necessarily capture the relationships between those numbers.
To create a richer numerical representation of our text, we can use an embedding.
As our model learns (by going through many different examples of abstract sentences and their labels), it'll update its embedding to better represent the relationships between tokens in our corpus.
We can create a trainable embedding layer using TensorFlow's Embedding layer.
Once again, the main parameters we're concerned with here are the inputs and outputs of our Embedding layer.
The input_dim parameter defines the size of our vocabulary. And the output_dim parameter defines the dimension of the embedding output.
Once created, our embedding layer will take the integer outputs of our text_vectorization layer as inputs and convert them to feature vectors of size output_dim.
Let's see it in action.
# Create token embedding layer
token_embed = layers.Embedding(input_dim=len(rct_20k_text_vocab), # length of vocabulary
output_dim=128, # Note: different embedding sizes result in drastically different numbers of parameters to train
# Use masking to handle variable sequence lengths (save space)
mask_zero=True,
name="token_embedding")
# Show example embedding
print(f"Sentence before vectorization:\n{target_sentence}\n")
vectorized_sentence = text_vectorizer([target_sentence])
print(f"Sentence after vectorization (before embedding):\n{vectorized_sentence}\n")
embedded_sentence = token_embed(vectorized_sentence)
print(f"Sentence after embedding:\n{embedded_sentence}\n")
print(f"Embedded sentence shape: {embedded_sentence.shape}")
Sentence before vectorization:
patients later completed a ten-question true-or-false knowledge questionnaire and a six-item satisfaction survey .
Sentence after vectorization (before embedding):
[[ 12 869 253 8 44042 43177 494 325 3 8 34340 428
885 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0]]
Sentence after embedding:
[[[ 0.03009653 -0.00744227 0.03255219 ... 0.04350514 0.02615802
0.01004974]
[ 0.00894579 -0.04471136 0.04325384 ... 0.00689 0.03921053
-0.01831497]
[ 0.0371519 0.01963044 -0.0322178 ... 0.01794907 -0.00109234
0.02466574]
...
[ 0.03691586 -0.00786442 -0.04396362 ... 0.04501832 0.00408162
-0.02123723]
[ 0.03691586 -0.00786442 -0.04396362 ... 0.04501832 0.00408162
-0.02123723]
[ 0.03691586 -0.00786442 -0.04396362 ... 0.04501832 0.00408162
-0.02123723]]]
Embedded sentence shape: (1, 55, 128)
Create datasets (as fast as possible)¶
We've gone through all the trouble of preprocessing our datasets to be used with a machine learning model, however, there are still a few steps we can use to make them work faster with our models.
Namely, the tf.data API provides methods which enable faster data loading.
📖 Resource: For best practices on data loading in TensorFlow, check out the following:
The main steps we'll want to use with our data is to turn it into a PrefetchDataset of batches.
Doing so we'll ensure TensorFlow loads our data onto the GPU as fast as possible, in turn leading to faster training time.
To create a batched PrefetchDataset we can use the methods batch() and prefetch(), the parameter tf.data.AUTOTUNE will also allow TensorFlow to determine the optimal amount of compute to use to prepare datasets.
# Turn our data into TensorFlow Datasets
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((train_sentences, train_labels_one_hot))
valid_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((val_sentences, val_labels_one_hot))
test_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((test_sentences, test_labels_one_hot))
train_dataset
<_TensorSliceDataset element_spec=(TensorSpec(shape=(), dtype=tf.string, name=None), TensorSpec(shape=(5,), dtype=tf.float64, name=None))>
# Take the TensorSliceDataset's and turn them into prefetched batches
train_dataset = train_dataset.batch(32).prefetch(tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
valid_dataset = valid_dataset.batch(32).prefetch(tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
test_dataset = test_dataset.batch(32).prefetch(tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
train_dataset
<_PrefetchDataset element_spec=(TensorSpec(shape=(None,), dtype=tf.string, name=None), TensorSpec(shape=(None, 5), dtype=tf.float64, name=None))>
Model 1: Conv1D with token embeddings¶
Alright, we've now got a way to numerically represent our text and labels, time to build a series of deep models to try and improve upon our baseline.
All of our deep models will follow a similar structure:
Input (text) -> Tokenize -> Embedding -> Layers -> Output (label probability)
The main component we'll be changing throughout is the Layers component. Because any modern deep NLP model requires text to be converted into an embedding before meaningful patterns can be discovered within.
The first model we're going to build is a 1-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.
We're also going to be following the standard machine learning workflow of:
- Build model
- Train model
- Evaluate model (make predictions and compare to ground truth)
# Create 1D convolutional model to process sequences
inputs = layers.Input(shape=(1,), dtype=tf.string)
text_vectors = text_vectorizer(inputs) # vectorize text inputs
token_embeddings = token_embed(text_vectors) # create embedding
x = layers.Conv1D(64, kernel_size=5, padding="same", activation="relu")(token_embeddings)
x = layers.GlobalAveragePooling1D()(x) # condense the output of our feature vector
outputs = layers.Dense(num_classes, activation="softmax")(x)
model_1 = tf.keras.Model(inputs, outputs)
# Compile
model_1.compile(loss="categorical_crossentropy", # if your labels are integer form (not one hot) use sparse_categorical_crossentropy
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics=["accuracy"])
# Get summary of Conv1D model
model_1.summary()
Model: "model"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
input_1 (InputLayer) [(None, 1)] 0
text_vectorization (TextVec (None, 55) 0
torization)
token_embedding (Embedding) (None, 55, 128) 8299648
conv1d (Conv1D) (None, 55, 64) 41024
global_average_pooling1d (G (None, 64) 0
lobalAveragePooling1D)
dense (Dense) (None, 5) 325
=================================================================
Total params: 8,340,997
Trainable params: 8,340,997
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
Wonderful! We've got our first deep sequence model built and ready to go.
Checking out the model summary, you'll notice the majority of the trainable parameters are within the embedding layer. If we were to increase the size of the embedding (by increasing the output_dim parameter of the Embedding layer), the number of trainable parameters would increase dramatically.
It's time to fit our model to the training data but we're going to make a mindful change.
Since our training data contains nearly 200,000 sentences, fitting a deep model may take a while even with a GPU. So to keep our experiments swift, we're going to run them on a subset of the training dataset.
More specifically, we'll only use the first 10% of batches (about 18,000 samples) of the training set to train on and the first 10% of batches from the validation set to validate on.
🔑 Note: It's a standard practice in machine learning to test your models on smaller subsets of data first to make sure they work before scaling them to larger amounts of data. You should aim to run many smaller experiments rather than only a handful of large experiments. And since your time is limited, one of the best ways to run smaller experiments is to reduce the amount of data you're working with (10% of the full dataset is usually a good amount, as long as it covers a similar distribution).
# Fit the model
model_1_history = model_1.fit(train_dataset,
steps_per_epoch=int(0.1 * len(train_dataset)), # only fit on 10% of batches for faster training time
epochs=3,
validation_data=valid_dataset,
validation_steps=int(0.1 * len(valid_dataset))) # only validate on 10% of batches
Epoch 1/3 562/562 [==============================] - 43s 58ms/step - loss: 0.9185 - accuracy: 0.6350 - val_loss: 0.6871 - val_accuracy: 0.7380 Epoch 2/3 562/562 [==============================] - 7s 12ms/step - loss: 0.6603 - accuracy: 0.7560 - val_loss: 0.6322 - val_accuracy: 0.7696 Epoch 3/3 562/562 [==============================] - 4s 7ms/step - loss: 0.6194 - accuracy: 0.7724 - val_loss: 0.5967 - val_accuracy: 0.7812
Brilliant! We've got our first trained deep sequence model, and it didn't take too long (and if we didn't prefetch our batched data, it would've taken longer).
Time to make some predictions with our model and then evaluate them.
# Evaluate on whole validation dataset (we only validated on 10% of batches during training)
model_1.evaluate(valid_dataset)
945/945 [==============================] - 2s 3ms/step - loss: 0.5993 - accuracy: 0.7856
[0.5992922186851501, 0.7856481075286865]
# Make predictions (our model outputs prediction probabilities for each class)
model_1_pred_probs = model_1.predict(valid_dataset)
model_1_pred_probs
945/945 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step
array([[4.2276028e-01, 1.9543630e-01, 7.8329526e-02, 2.7373073e-01,
2.9743196e-02],
[4.6485636e-01, 2.7058390e-01, 1.1763435e-02, 2.4558942e-01,
7.2069145e-03],
[1.4821406e-01, 4.6900036e-03, 1.9654778e-03, 8.4511346e-01,
1.7043541e-05],
...,
[4.6908235e-06, 6.0919154e-04, 7.0814672e-04, 2.9213641e-06,
9.9867505e-01],
[4.5269396e-02, 4.8612341e-01, 8.2452036e-02, 5.5686332e-02,
3.3046886e-01],
[1.8509193e-01, 6.2405616e-01, 5.6467425e-02, 5.4003950e-02,
8.0380574e-02]], dtype=float32)
# Convert pred probs to classes
model_1_preds = tf.argmax(model_1_pred_probs, axis=1)
model_1_preds
<tf.Tensor: shape=(30212,), dtype=int64, numpy=array([0, 0, 3, ..., 4, 1, 1])>
# Calculate model_1 results
model_1_results = calculate_results(y_true=val_labels_encoded,
y_pred=model_1_preds)
model_1_results
{'accuracy': 78.56480868529061,
'precision': 0.7824092300813684,
'recall': 0.7856480868529061,
'f1': 0.7829939778477344}
Model 2: Feature extraction with pretrained token embeddings¶
Training our own embeddings took a little while to run, slowing our experiments down.
Since we're moving towards replicating the model architecture in Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification in Medical Paper Abstracts, it mentions they used a pretrained GloVe embedding as a way to initialise their token embeddings.
To emulate this, let's see what results we can get with the pretrained Universal Sentence Encoder embeddings from TensorFlow Hub.
🔑 Note: We could use GloVe embeddings as per the paper but since we're working with TensorFlow, we'll use what's available from TensorFlow Hub (GloVe embeddings aren't). We'll save using pretrained GloVe embeddings as an extension.
The model structure will look like:
Inputs (string) -> Pretrained embeddings from TensorFlow Hub (Universal Sentence Encoder) -> Layers -> Output (prediction probabilities)
You'll notice the lack of tokenization layer we've used in a previous model. This is because the Universal Sentence Encoder (USE) takes care of tokenization for us.
This type of model is called transfer learning, or more specifically, feature extraction transfer learning. In other words, taking the patterns a model has learned elsewhere and applying it to our own problem.
The feature extractor model we're building using a pretrained embedding from TensorFlow Hub.
To download the pretrained USE into a layer we can use in our model, we can use the hub.KerasLayer class.
We'll keep the pretrained embeddings frozen (by setting trainable=False) and add a trainable couple of layers on the top to tailor the model outputs to our own data.
🔑 Note: Due to having to download a relatively large model (~916MB), the cell below may take a little while to run.
# Download pretrained TensorFlow Hub USE
import tensorflow_hub as hub
tf_hub_embedding_layer = hub.KerasLayer("https://tfhub.dev/google/universal-sentence-encoder/4",
trainable=False,
name="universal_sentence_encoder")
Beautiful, now our pretrained USE is downloaded and instantiated as a hub.KerasLayer instance, let's test it out on a random sentence.
# Test out the embedding on a random sentence
random_training_sentence = random.choice(train_sentences)
print(f"Random training sentence:\n{random_training_sentence}\n")
use_embedded_sentence = tf_hub_embedding_layer([random_training_sentence])
print(f"Sentence after embedding:\n{use_embedded_sentence[0][:30]} (truncated output)...\n")
print(f"Length of sentence embedding:\n{len(use_embedded_sentence[0])}")
Random training sentence: our data justify the need for personalized integrated antioxidant and energy correction therapy . Sentence after embedding: [-0.03416213 -0.05093268 -0.07358423 0.04783727 -0.05375864 0.07531483 -0.0618328 -0.00023192 0.05290754 0.00731164 0.02909756 -0.03293613 -0.05592315 0.02519475 -0.08728898 -0.02306924 -0.06509812 0.01185254 -0.05143833 -0.01459878 0.03741732 0.05964429 0.03533797 0.05038223 0.00830391 -0.05242855 0.05673083 -0.06287023 0.08674113 0.06334175] (truncated output)... Length of sentence embedding: 512
Nice! As we mentioned before the pretrained USE module from TensorFlow Hub takes care of tokenizing our text for us and outputs a 512 dimensional embedding vector.
Let's put together and compile a model using our tf_hub_embedding_layer.
Building and fitting an NLP feature extraction model from TensorFlow Hub¶
# Define feature extractor model using TF Hub layer
inputs = layers.Input(shape=[], dtype=tf.string)
pretrained_embedding = tf_hub_embedding_layer(inputs) # tokenize text and create embedding
x = layers.Dense(128, activation="relu")(pretrained_embedding) # add a fully connected layer on top of the embedding
# Note: you could add more layers here if you wanted to
outputs = layers.Dense(5, activation="softmax")(x) # create the output layer
model_2 = tf.keras.Model(inputs=inputs,
outputs=outputs)
# Compile the model
model_2.compile(loss="categorical_crossentropy",
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics=["accuracy"])
# Get a summary of the model
model_2.summary()
Model: "model_1"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
input_2 (InputLayer) [(None,)] 0
universal_sentence_encoder (None, 512) 256797824
(KerasLayer)
dense_1 (Dense) (None, 128) 65664
dense_2 (Dense) (None, 5) 645
=================================================================
Total params: 256,864,133
Trainable params: 66,309
Non-trainable params: 256,797,824
_________________________________________________________________
Checking the summary of our model we can see there's a large number of total parameters, however, the majority of these are non-trainable. This is because we set training=False when we instatiated our USE feature extractor layer.
So when we train our model, only the top two output layers will be trained.
# Fit feature extractor model for 3 epochs
model_2.fit(train_dataset,
steps_per_epoch=int(0.1 * len(train_dataset)),
epochs=3,
validation_data=valid_dataset,
validation_steps=int(0.1 * len(valid_dataset)))
Epoch 1/3 562/562 [==============================] - 9s 11ms/step - loss: 0.9207 - accuracy: 0.6496 - val_loss: 0.7936 - val_accuracy: 0.6908 Epoch 2/3 562/562 [==============================] - 6s 10ms/step - loss: 0.7659 - accuracy: 0.7047 - val_loss: 0.7499 - val_accuracy: 0.7074 Epoch 3/3 562/562 [==============================] - 6s 11ms/step - loss: 0.7471 - accuracy: 0.7145 - val_loss: 0.7328 - val_accuracy: 0.7178
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x7efb005bdff0>
# Evaluate on whole validation dataset
model_2.evaluate(valid_dataset)
945/945 [==============================] - 8s 8ms/step - loss: 0.7349 - accuracy: 0.7161
[0.7349329590797424, 0.7161061763763428]
Since we aren't training our own custom embedding layer, training is much quicker.
Let's make some predictions and evaluate our feature extraction model.
# Make predictions with feature extraction model
model_2_pred_probs = model_2.predict(valid_dataset)
model_2_pred_probs
945/945 [==============================] - 8s 8ms/step
array([[4.1435534e-01, 3.6443055e-01, 2.5627650e-03, 2.1054386e-01,
8.1075458e-03],
[3.4644338e-01, 4.7939345e-01, 4.0907143e-03, 1.6641928e-01,
3.6531438e-03],
[2.3935708e-01, 1.6314813e-01, 1.9130943e-02, 5.4523116e-01,
3.3132695e-02],
...,
[2.2427505e-03, 5.5871238e-03, 4.6554163e-02, 7.6473231e-04,
9.4485116e-01],
[3.8972907e-03, 4.4690356e-02, 2.0484674e-01, 1.4869794e-03,
7.4507862e-01],
[1.5384717e-01, 2.5815260e-01, 5.2709770e-01, 7.3189661e-03,
5.3583570e-02]], dtype=float32)
# Convert the predictions with feature extraction model to classes
model_2_preds = tf.argmax(model_2_pred_probs, axis=1)
model_2_preds
<tf.Tensor: shape=(30212,), dtype=int64, numpy=array([0, 1, 3, ..., 4, 4, 2])>
# Calculate results from TF Hub pretrained embeddings results on validation set
model_2_results = calculate_results(y_true=val_labels_encoded,
y_pred=model_2_preds)
model_2_results
{'accuracy': 71.61061829736528,
'precision': 0.7161610082576743,
'recall': 0.7161061829736528,
'f1': 0.7128311588798425}
Model 3: Conv1D with character embeddings¶
Creating a character-level tokenizer¶
The Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification in Medical Paper Abstracts paper mentions their model uses a hybrid of token and character embeddings.
We've built models with a custom token embedding and a pretrained token embedding, how about we build one using a character embedding?
The difference between a character and token embedding is that the character embedding is created using sequences split into characters (e.g. hello -> [h, e, l, l, o]) where as a token embedding is created on sequences split into tokens.
Token level embeddings split sequences into tokens (words) and embeddings each of them, character embeddings split sequences into characters and creates a feature vector for each.
We can create a character-level embedding by first vectorizing our sequences (after they've been split into characters) using the TextVectorization class and then passing those vectorized sequences through an Embedding layer.
Before we can vectorize our sequences on a character-level we'll need to split them into characters. Let's write a function to do so.
# Make function to split sentences into characters
def split_chars(text):
return " ".join(list(text))
# Test splitting non-character-level sequence into characters
split_chars(random_training_sentence)
'o u r d a t a j u s t i f y t h e n e e d f o r p e r s o n a l i z e d i n t e g r a t e d a n t i o x i d a n t a n d e n e r g y c o r r e c t i o n t h e r a p y .'
Great! Looks like our character-splitting function works. Let's create character-level datasets by splitting our sequence datasets into characters.
# Split sequence-level data splits into character-level data splits
train_chars = [split_chars(sentence) for sentence in train_sentences]
val_chars = [split_chars(sentence) for sentence in val_sentences]
test_chars = [split_chars(sentence) for sentence in test_sentences]
print(train_chars[0])
t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e e f f i c a c y o f @ w e e k s o f d a i l y l o w - d o s e o r a l p r e d n i s o l o n e i n i m p r o v i n g p a i n , m o b i l i t y , a n d s y s t e m i c l o w - g r a d e i n f l a m m a t i o n i n t h e s h o r t t e r m a n d w h e t h e r t h e e f f e c t w o u l d b e s u s t a i n e d a t @ w e e k s i n o l d e r a d u l t s w i t h m o d e r a t e t o s e v e r e k n e e o s t e o a r t h r i t i s ( o a ) .
To figure out how long our vectorized character sequences should be, let's check the distribution of our character sequence lengths.
# What's the average character length?
char_lens = [len(sentence) for sentence in train_sentences]
mean_char_len = np.mean(char_lens)
mean_char_len
149.3662574983337
# Check the distribution of our sequences at character-level
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.hist(char_lens, bins=7);
Okay, looks like most of our sequences are between 0 and 200 characters long.
Let's use NumPy's percentile to figure out what length covers 95% of our sequences.
# Find what character length covers 95% of sequences
output_seq_char_len = int(np.percentile(char_lens, 95))
output_seq_char_len
290
Wonderful, now we know the sequence length which covers 95% of sequences, we'll use that in our TextVectorization layer as the output_sequence_length parameter.
🔑 Note: You can experiment here to figure out what the optimal
output_sequence_lengthshould be, perhaps using the mean results in as good results as using the 95% percentile.
We'll set max_tokens (the total number of different characters in our sequences) to 28, in other words, 26 letters of the alphabet + space + OOV (out of vocabulary or unknown) tokens.
# Get all keyboard characters for char-level embedding
import string
alphabet = string.ascii_lowercase + string.digits + string.punctuation
alphabet
'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789!"#$%&\'()*+,-./:;<=>?@[\\]^_`{|}~'
# Create char-level token vectorizer instance
NUM_CHAR_TOKENS = len(alphabet) + 2 # num characters in alphabet + space + OOV token
char_vectorizer = TextVectorization(max_tokens=NUM_CHAR_TOKENS,
output_sequence_length=output_seq_char_len,
standardize="lower_and_strip_punctuation",
name="char_vectorizer")
# Adapt character vectorizer to training characters
char_vectorizer.adapt(train_chars)
Nice! Now we've adapted our char_vectorizer to our character-level sequences, let's check out some characteristics about it using the get_vocabulary() method.
# Check character vocabulary characteristics
char_vocab = char_vectorizer.get_vocabulary()
print(f"Number of different characters in character vocab: {len(char_vocab)}")
print(f"5 most common characters: {char_vocab[:5]}")
print(f"5 least common characters: {char_vocab[-5:]}")
Number of different characters in character vocab: 28 5 most common characters: ['', '[UNK]', 'e', 't', 'i'] 5 least common characters: ['k', 'x', 'z', 'q', 'j']
We can also test it on random sequences of characters to make sure it's working.
# Test out character vectorizer
random_train_chars = random.choice(train_chars)
print(f"Charified text:\n{random_train_chars}")
print(f"\nLength of chars: {len(random_train_chars.split())}")
vectorized_chars = char_vectorizer([random_train_chars])
print(f"\nVectorized chars:\n{vectorized_chars}")
print(f"\nLength of vectorized chars: {len(vectorized_chars[0])}")
Charified text: e x a m i n e t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f d e m o g r a p h i c s a n d h e a l t h c o n d i t i o n s , a l o n e a n d i n c o m b i n a t i o n , o n o b j e c t i v e m e a s u r e s o f c o g n i t i v e f u n c t i o n i n a l a r g e s a m p l e o f c o m m u n i t y - d w e l l i n g o l d e r a d u l t s . Length of chars: 162 Vectorized chars: [[ 2 24 5 15 4 6 2 3 13 2 8 2 12 5 3 4 7 6 9 13 4 14 7 17 10 2 15 7 18 8 5 14 13 4 11 9 5 6 10 13 2 5 12 3 13 11 7 6 10 4 3 4 7 6 9 5 12 7 6 2 5 6 10 4 6 11 7 15 22 4 6 5 3 4 7 6 7 6 7 22 27 2 11 3 4 21 2 15 2 5 9 16 8 2 9 7 17 11 7 18 6 4 3 4 21 2 17 16 6 11 3 4 7 6 4 6 5 12 5 8 18 2 9 5 15 14 12 2 7 17 11 7 15 15 16 6 4 3 19 10 20 2 12 12 4 6 18 7 12 10 2 8 5 10 16 12 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]] Length of vectorized chars: 290
You'll notice sequences with a length shorter than 290 (output_seq_char_length) get padded with zeros on the end, this ensures all sequences passed to our model are the same length.
Also, due to the standardize parameter of TextVectorization being "lower_and_strip_punctuation" and the split parameter being "whitespace" by default, symbols (such as @) and spaces are removed.
🔑 Note: If you didn't want punctuation to be removed (keep the
@,%etc), you can create a custom standardization callable and pass it as thestandardizeparameter. See theTextVectorizationlayer documentation for more.
Creating a character-level embedding¶
We've got a way to vectorize our character-level sequences, now's time to create a character-level embedding.
Just like our custom token embedding, we can do so using the tensorflow.keras.layers.Embedding class.
Our character-level embedding layer requires an input dimension and output dimension.
The input dimension (input_dim) will be equal to the number of different characters in our char_vocab (28). And since we're following the structure of the model in Figure 1 of Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification
in Medical Paper Abstracts, the output dimension of the character embedding (output_dim) will be 25.
# Create char embedding layer
char_embed = layers.Embedding(input_dim=NUM_CHAR_TOKENS, # number of different characters
output_dim=25, # embedding dimension of each character (same as Figure 1 in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05251.pdf)
mask_zero=False, # don't use masks (this messes up model_5 if set to True)
name="char_embed")
# Test out character embedding layer
print(f"Charified text (before vectorization and embedding):\n{random_train_chars}\n")
char_embed_example = char_embed(char_vectorizer([random_train_chars]))
print(f"Embedded chars (after vectorization and embedding):\n{char_embed_example}\n")
print(f"Character embedding shape: {char_embed_example.shape}")
Charified text (before vectorization and embedding):
e x a m i n e t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f d e m o g r a p h i c s a n d h e a l t h c o n d i t i o n s , a l o n e a n d i n c o m b i n a t i o n , o n o b j e c t i v e m e a s u r e s o f c o g n i t i v e f u n c t i o n i n a l a r g e s a m p l e o f c o m m u n i t y - d w e l l i n g o l d e r a d u l t s .
Embedded chars (after vectorization and embedding):
[[[-0.0242999 -0.04380112 0.03424067 ... -0.00923825 -0.03137535
0.04647223]
[ 0.03587342 -0.03863243 -0.03250255 ... -0.01955168 0.03022561
-0.01134545]
[ 0.04515156 0.0074586 0.04069341 ... -0.01211466 -0.02348533
0.03110148]
...
[-0.04492947 0.00582002 0.02089256 ... 0.02795838 -0.00649694
-0.03568561]
[-0.04492947 0.00582002 0.02089256 ... 0.02795838 -0.00649694
-0.03568561]
[-0.04492947 0.00582002 0.02089256 ... 0.02795838 -0.00649694
-0.03568561]]]
Character embedding shape: (1, 290, 25)
Wonderful! Each of the characters in our sequences gets turned into a 25 dimension embedding.
Building a Conv1D model to fit on character embeddings¶
Now we've got a way to turn our character-level sequences into numbers (char_vectorizer) as well as numerically represent them as an embedding (char_embed) let's test how effective they are at encoding the information in our sequences by creating a character-level sequence model.
The model will have the same structure as our custom token embedding model (model_1) except it'll take character-level sequences as input instead of token-level sequences.
Input (character-level text) -> Tokenize -> Embedding -> Layers (Conv1D, GlobalMaxPool1D) -> Output (label probability)
# Make Conv1D on chars only
inputs = layers.Input(shape=(1,), dtype="string")
char_vectors = char_vectorizer(inputs)
char_embeddings = char_embed(char_vectors)
x = layers.Conv1D(64, kernel_size=5, padding="same", activation="relu")(char_embeddings)
x = layers.GlobalMaxPool1D()(x)
outputs = layers.Dense(num_classes, activation="softmax")(x)
model_3 = tf.keras.Model(inputs=inputs,
outputs=outputs,
name="model_3_conv1D_char_embedding")
# Compile model
model_3.compile(loss="categorical_crossentropy",
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(),
metrics=["accuracy"])
# Check the summary of conv1d_char_model
model_3.summary()
Model: "model_3_conv1D_char_embedding"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
input_3 (InputLayer) [(None, 1)] 0
char_vectorizer (TextVector (None, 290) 0
ization)
char_embed (Embedding) (None, 290, 25) 1750
conv1d_1 (Conv1D) (None, 290, 64) 8064
global_max_pooling1d (Globa (None, 64) 0
lMaxPooling1D)
dense_3 (Dense) (None, 5) 325
=================================================================
Total params: 10,139
Trainable params: 10,139
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________
Before fitting our model on the data, we'll create char-level batched PrefetchedDataset's.
# Create char datasets
train_char_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((train_chars, train_labels_one_hot)).batch(32).prefetch(tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
val_char_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((val_chars, val_labels_one_hot)).batch(32).prefetch(tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
train_char_dataset
<_PrefetchDataset element_spec=(TensorSpec(shape=(None,), dtype=tf.string, name=None), TensorSpec(shape=(None, 5), dtype=tf.float64, name=None))>
Just like our token-level sequence model, to save time with our experiments, we'll fit the character-level model on 10% of batches.
# Fit the model on chars only
model_3_history = model_3.fit(train_char_dataset,
steps_per_epoch=int(0.1 * len(train_char_dataset)),
epochs=3,
validation_data=val_char_dataset,
validation_steps=int(0.1 * len(val_char_dataset)))
Epoch 1/3 562/562 [==============================] - 5s 6ms/step - loss: 1.2876 - accuracy: 0.4835 - val_loss: 1.0503 - val_accuracy: 0.5934 Epoch 2/3 562/562 [==============================] - 3s 5ms/step - loss: 0.9992 - accuracy: 0.6053 - val_loss: 0.9375 - val_accuracy: 0.6330 Epoch 3/3 562/562 [==============================] - 2s 4ms/step - loss: 0.9217 - accuracy: 0.6366 - val_loss: 0.8723 - val_accuracy: 0.6576
# Evaluate model_3 on whole validation char dataset
model_3.evaluate(val_char_dataset)
945/945 [==============================] - 3s 3ms/step - loss: 0.8830 - accuracy: 0.6543
[0.8829597234725952, 0.6543095707893372]
Nice! Looks like our character-level model is working, let's make some predictions with it and evaluate them.
# Make predictions with character model only
model_3_pred_probs = model_3.predict(val_char_dataset)
model_3_pred_probs
945/945 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step
array([[0.16555832, 0.40962285, 0.10694715, 0.24029495, 0.07757679],
[0.15813953, 0.53640217, 0.01517234, 0.26619416, 0.02409185],
[0.12398545, 0.23686218, 0.16067787, 0.41156322, 0.06691124],
...,
[0.03653853, 0.05342488, 0.29759905, 0.0883414 , 0.52409613],
[0.07498587, 0.1934537 , 0.29657316, 0.10817684, 0.3268104 ],
[0.3868036 , 0.46745342, 0.07763865, 0.04975864, 0.01834559]],
dtype=float32)
# Convert predictions to classes
model_3_preds = tf.argmax(model_3_pred_probs, axis=1)
model_3_preds
<tf.Tensor: shape=(30212,), dtype=int64, numpy=array([1, 1, 3, ..., 4, 4, 1])>
# Calculate Conv1D char only model results
model_3_results = calculate_results(y_true=val_labels_encoded,
y_pred=model_3_preds)
model_3_results
{'accuracy': 65.4309545875811,
'precision': 0.6475618110732863,
'recall': 0.6543095458758109,
'f1': 0.6428526324260226}
Model 4: Combining pretrained token embeddings + character embeddings (hybrid embedding layer)¶
Alright, now things are going to get spicy.
In moving closer to build a model similar to the one in Figure 1 of Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification in Medical Paper Abstracts, it's time we tackled the hybrid token embedding layer they speak of.
This hybrid token embedding layer is a combination of token embeddings and character embeddings. In other words, they create a stacked embedding to represent sequences before passing them to the sequence label prediction layer.
So far we've built two models which have used token and character-level embeddings, however, these two models have used each of these embeddings exclusively.
To start replicating (or getting close to replicating) the model in Figure 1, we're going to go through the following steps:
- Create a token-level model (similar to
model_1) - Create a character-level model (similar to
model_3with a slight modification to reflect the paper) - Combine (using
layers.Concatenate) the outputs of 1 and 2 - Build a series of output layers on top of 3 similar to Figure 1 and section 4.2 of [*Neural Networks for Joint Sentence Classification
in Medical Paper Abstracts*](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05251.pdf) 5. Construct a model which takes token and character-level sequences as input and produces sequence label probabilities as output
# 1. Setup token inputs/model
token_inputs = layers.Input(shape=[], dtype=tf.string, name="token_input")
token_embeddings = tf_hub_embedding_layer(token_inputs)
token_output = layers.Dense(128, activation="relu")(token_embeddings)
token_model = tf.keras.Model(inputs=token_inputs,
outputs=token_output)
# 2. Setup char inputs/model
char_inputs = layers.Input(shape=(1,), dtype=tf.string, name="char_input")
char_vectors = char_vectorizer(char_inputs)
char_embeddings = char_embed(char_vectors)
char_bi_lstm = layers.Bidirectional(layers.LSTM(25))(char_embeddings) # bi-LSTM shown in Figure 1 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05251.pdf
char_model = tf.keras.Model(inputs=char_inputs,
outputs=char_bi_lstm)
# 3. Concatenate token and char inputs (create hybrid token embedding)
token_char_concat = layers.Concatenate(name="token_char_hybrid")([token_model.output,
char_model.output])
# 4. Create output layers - addition of dropout discussed in 4.2 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.05251.pdf
combined_dropout = layers.Dropout(0.5)(token_char_concat)
combined_dense = layers.Dense(200, activation="relu")(combined_dropout) # slightly different to Figure 1 due to different shapes of token/char embedding layers
final_dropout = layers.Dropout(0.5)(combined_dense)
output_layer = layers.Dense(num_classes, activation="softmax")(final_dropout)
# 5. Construct model with char and token inputs
model_4 = tf.keras.Model(inputs=[token_model.input, char_model.input],
outputs=output_layer,
name="model_4_token_and_char_embeddings")
Woah... There's a lot going on here, let's get a summary and plot our model to visualize what's happening.
# Get summary of token and character model
model_4.summary()
Model: "model_4_token_and_char_embeddings"
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param # Connected to
==================================================================================================
char_input (InputLayer) [(None, 1)] 0 []
token_input (InputLayer) [(None,)] 0 []
char_vectorizer (TextVectoriza (None, 290) 0 ['char_input[0][0]']
tion)
universal_sentence_encoder (Ke (None, 512) 256797824 ['token_input[0][0]']
rasLayer)
char_embed (Embedding) (None, 290, 25) 1750 ['char_vectorizer[1][0]']
dense_4 (Dense) (None, 128) 65664 ['universal_sentence_encoder[1][0
]']
bidirectional (Bidirectional) (None, 50) 10200 ['char_embed[1][0]']
token_char_hybrid (Concatenate (None, 178) 0 ['dense_4[0][0]',
) 'bidirectional[0][0]']
dropout (Dropout) (None, 178) 0 ['token_char_hybrid[0][0]']
dense_5 (Dense) (None, 200) 35800 ['dropout[0][0]']
dropout_1 (Dropout) (None, 200) 0 ['dense_5[0][0]']
dense_6 (Dense) (None, 5) 1005 ['dropout_1[0][0]']
==================================================================================================
Total params: 256,912,243
Trainable params: 114,419
Non-trainable params: 256,797,824
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
# Plot hybrid token and character model
from tensorflow.keras.utils import plot_model
plot_model(model_4)